Fortune Journals

Fortune Journal of Health Sciences

ISSN: 2644-2906 Peer Reviewed Open Access
Submit Manuscript →

Association Between the Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index and Anemia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Vol 9, Issue 2 Pages 248–255 Published: 17 Jun 2026

Yuyan Gu1, Xin Xu2, Xinghong Lin*,2

1Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China;

2Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.

*Corresponding Author: Xinghong Lin, Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.

Received: 27 May 2026; Accepted: 01 June 2026; Published: 00 June 2026

Article Information
Citation: Yuyan Gu, Xin Xu, Xinghong Lin. Association Between the Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index and Anemia: A Cross Sectional Study. Fortune Journal of Health Sciences. 9 (2026): 248-255.

DOI: 10.26502/fjhs.417

Share
Abstract

As an important indicator of an antioxidant-rich diet, the composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI) has been associated with various disease conditions. However, its associations with anemia remains poorly understood. Our study aimed to investigate the relationship of the CDAI with anemia in the general adults. A total of 9958 participants were enrolled from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2011-2014. The CDAI was calculated from the intake of the six dietary antioxidants: vitamins A, C and E, carotenoid, selenium, and zinc. Multivariable logistic regressions were employed to explore the associations between the CDAI and anemia. Additionally, the restricted cubic spline (RCS) was performed to explore the non-linearity between the CDAI and anemia. Subgroup analysis was performed to confirm the association of the CDAI with anemia. Mediation analysis was used to explore the role played by albumin in the association between the CDAI and anemia. In the multivariable logistic regression model, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval, OR, 95%CI) of the CDAI per 1 unit increase for anemia was 0.97 (0.95-0.98; P = 0.001). Compared to the lowest quartile, the highest quartile of the CDAI was associated with a lower risk of anemia (0.73 [0.59-0.90]; P = 0.004). The CDAI component-specific analysis revealed that the odds ratios (95%CI) were 0.87 (0.76, 0.98; P = 0.035) for vitamin A, 0.98 (0.98, 0.99; P = 0.034) for vitamins E, and 0.98 (0.96, 0.99; P=0.003) for Zinc, respectively. Restricted cubic spline suggested that the relationship between the CDAI and anemia was linear. Further, subgroup analysis indicated a stable negative association between the CDAI and anemia (all P for interaction >0.05). Mediation analyses showed that the association of CDAI with anemia was mediated by the albumin, accounting for 42.92% (P < 0.001) of the total effects. Our study highlighted a negative linear association between the CDAI and anemia in the general adults. Intake of the six dietary antioxidants composing the CDAI could help to prevent the occurrence of anemia.

Keywords

Composite dietary antioxidant index; Anemia; Mediation analysis

Composite dietary antioxidant index articles; Anemia articles; Mediation analysis articles.

Article Details

Introduction

According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, approximately 1.8 billion people worldwide were inflicted with anemia [1]. Anemia can cause severe hypoxia of different organs, and patients may present symptoms such as cognitive decline, depression, cardiovascular complications, indigestion, dizziness, and exertional dyspnea [2]. When reactive oxygen species production was imbalanced with antioxidant defenses, oxidative stress can result in damage to cell death and functional impairment [3]. Clinical studies have demonstrated that anemia patients have been in hyper oxidative state [4]. Intake of antioxidants can mitigate the oxidative stress by boosting plasma levels of antioxidants, reducing the risk of anemia [5].

The CDAI is a composite estimate of a person's overall affinity for antioxidant exposure status, which is a summary score of the six dietary antioxidants, including vitamins A, C and E, carotenoid, selenium, and zinc [6]. Previous studies revealed that the higher CDAI is associated with a reduced risk of a variety of entities [7-10]. However, the relationship between the CDAI and anemia is not yet to be reported. Therefore, We hypothesized that elevated CDAI levels could prevent anemia, using data from the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database.

Methods

Study population

The current study included participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2011-2014). Individuals with missing dietary or hemoglobin data were excluded. We further excluded individuals younger than 18 years old and pregnant women. Finally, adults with complete information were included in our study. The survey was approved by the Ethical Review Board of National Center for Health Statistics and all participants provided written informed consent. This study used publicly available datasets from the NHANES database. The data can be found at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm.

Calculation of the CDAI

Each participants' food and nutrient intake in the NHANES was collected from the dietary interview component, which was called “what we eat in America.” The data analysis was conducted by the Food Surveys Research Group of the US Department of Agriculture. The participants responded to two recall surveys: the first time was in the Mobile Examination Center, while the second was on the telephone. We used the first recall data to avoid memory drift caused by too long a time. Based on the interview, we determined the intake of dietary supplements, including dosage, frequency, and duration of consumption [11]. The CDAI was based on the dietary intake of the six antioxidants: zinc, selenium, carotenoids, vitamins A, C, and E. Six antioxidants were standardized by subtracted the mean and divided by standard deviation. The dietary antioxidant intake in this study was calculated based on pure absolute intake and did not include antioxidants obtained from supplements, medications, or other additional sources. Then the CDAI was based on the sum of these standardized consumptions. The formula for the CDAI is as follows:

image

Where, Xi is the daily intake of antioxidants, ui is the mean of antioxidants, and Si is the standard deviation of ui (7).

Measurement of hemoglobin and Diagnosis of Anemia

According to the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria, the hemoglobin level (g/dL) for diagnosing anemia at sea level is <12 for women and <13 for men, respectively. Beckman Coulter HMX instrument in the Mobile Examination Centre produces a full blood count on a blood sample and provides blood cell distribution for all attendees.

Study variables

To control the influence of potential confounding factors, we selected the following covariates: age, sex, race, education levels, smoking status, drinking status, examination information on body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol (TC), serum iron, folate as well as self-reported diseases like diabetes mellitus and hypertension, congestive heart failure, and myocardial infarction. We divided race into non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican-American, and other groups. The education level was divided into three groups: below high school, high school, and above high school. Smoking status and drinking status were both categorized as never, former, and current. ‘Never smoking’ referred to someone who has not smoked over 100 cigarettes during their lifetime and does not smoke at present. ‘Former smoking’ was someone who has smoked over 100 cigarettes during their lifetime, but has not smoked within the past 28 days. ‘Current smoking’ was defined as a subject who has smoked over 100 cigarettes during their lifetime and has smoked at least once within the past 28 days. Never, former, and current drinking corresponded to the following situations, respectively, participants who drunk less than 12 drinks in their lifetime, individuals who drunk more than 12 drinks during their lifetime, but no drinks in the past year, and subjects who drunk in the past year. BMI was computed utilizing the formula weight (kg) divided by the square of height in meters.

Statistical analysis

Participants were divided into two groups based on whether or not they had anemia. Continuous variables were presented as means ± standard deviation while categorical variables were presented as counts (percentages). Student’s t test was used to analyze continuous variables and outcomes, and Chi-Square test was used for categorical variables. Multiple imputation for 25 times was performed for missing values. Logistic regression models was used to explore the relationship between the CDAI and anemia. Model 1 did not adjust for covariates, model 2 adjusted for age, sex, and race, and model 3 further adjusted for age, sex, race, education, total cholesterol, serum iron, BMI, folate, smoking, drinking, hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and myocardial infarction. The restricted cubic splines were performed to explore the nonlinearity between the CDAI and anemia. Multivariable linear regression models were employed to investigate the association between CDAI and the serum albumin. Mediator analysis was also used to explore whether the serum albumin mediated the association between the CDAI and anemia. Subgroup/sensitivity analysis was further performed to confirm the association of the CDAI with anemia stratified by sex, smoking status, drinking status, educational level, age, BMI, total cholesterol, folate, hypertension, and diabetes. These stratification factors were also considered pre-specified potential effect modifiers. An interaction term was added to test for heterogeneity in the associations between subgroups. All the analyses were performed using STATA version 17.0 and R software version 4.2.0. Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed P value <0.05.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

This study involved a total of 9958 participants (Figure.1). The baseline features of participants were described in detail in Table 1. Patients with anemia had lower CDAI scores. In addition, patients with anemia were older and female, had higher BMI and had lower albumin.

fortune-biomass-feedstock

Figure 1: The flow chart of participant selection

Table 1: Characteristics of the study population based on the presence of anemia status.

Variables

Overall (n = 9958)

Non-Anemia (n = 8888)

Anemia (n = 1070)

P

Age, years

47.23 ± 18.37

46.48 ± 18.10

53.41 ± 19.49

<0.001

Male, n (%)

4907(49.28)

4532 (50.99)

375(35.05)

<0.001

Race, n (%)

     

<0.001

Mexican American

1203(12.08)

1094(12.31)

109(10.19)

Non-Hispanic White

4107(41.24)

3845(43.26)

262(24.49)

Non-Hispanic Black

2265(22.75)

1784(20.07)

481(44.95)

Others

2383(23.93)

2165(24.36)

218(20.37)

Education level, n (%)

     

<0.001

Less than high school

2018(21.44)

1744(20.76)

274(27.00)

High school

2064(21.93)

1848(22.01)

216(21.28)

Above high school

5331(56.63)

4806(57.23)

525(51.72)

Marital status, n (%)

     

<0.001

Having a partner

5460(58.00)

4936(58.76)

524(51.63)

Others

3955(42.00)

3464(41.24)

491(48.37)

Smoking status, n (%)

     

<0.001

Never

5550(57.27)

4482(56.44)

668(64.17)

Former

2209(22.97)

1958(22.64)

251(24.11)

Current

1932(19.94)

1810(20.92)

122(11.72)

Drinking status, n (%)

     

<0.001

Never

1476(15.67)

1270(15.11)

206(20.38)

Former

1551(16.47)

1315(15.64)

236(23.34)

Current

6390(67.86)

5821(69.25)

569(56.28)

BMI, kg/m2

28.88 ± 7.08

28.79 ± 7.01

29.65 ± 7.64

<0.001

Energy intake, kcal/day

2135.67 ± 1022.22

2166.97 ± 1033.22

1875.72 ±884.37

<0.001

Albumin, g/L

42.78 ± 3.31

43.06 ± 3.19

40.45 ± 3.39

<0.001

Serum iron, umol/L

15.11 ± 6.41

15.66 ± 6.24

10.47 ± 5.88

<0.001

TC, mmol/L

4.90 ± 1.07

4.94 ± 1.07

4.56 ± 1.05

<0.001

Hemoglobin, g/dL

13.97 ± 1.52

14.29 ± 1.23

11.34 ± 1.06

<0.001

Folate, nmol/L

2.14 ± 13.76

2.03 ± 12.85

3.03 ± 19.76

0.027

CDAI

0.22 ± 4.13

0.31 ± 4.18

-0.59 ± 3.56

<0.001

Hypertension, n (%)

1,343(13.49)

1108(12.47)

235(21.96)

<0.001

Diabetes, n (%)

1742(17.50)

1430(16.10)

312(29.16)

<0.001

CHF, n (%)

304(3.23)

218(2.60)

86(8.5)

<0.001

CHD, n (%)

364(3.88)

290(3.46)

74(7.31)

<0.001

Continuous variables were presented as means ± standard deviation while categorical variables were presented as counts (percentages). Student’s t test was used to analyze continuous variables and outcomes, and Chi-Square test was used for categorical variables. BMI=body mass index; TC=total cholesterol; CHF=congestive heart failure; CHD=coronary heart disease; and CDAI=composite dietary antioxidant index.

Association between the CDAI and anemia

In this study, three models were constructed to examine the relationship between the CDAI and anemia (Table 2). In the multivariable analysis, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.97 (0.95–0.98; P = 0.001) per 1 unit increase in the CDAI for the risk of anemia. On the categorical scale, as compared to the lowest CDAI quartile (Q1), the multivariable analysis revealed that the ORs for the risk of anemia were 0.89 [0.74-1.07] for Q2 (P = 0.221), 0.87 (0.72-1.06) for Q3 (P = 0.161), and 0.74 (0.60-0.91) for Q4 (P = 0.004). This association was strengthened with the incremental quartiles of the CDAI (P for trend=0.005).

Table 2: Association of the CDAI with anemia on a continuous or a categorical scale.

Model

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

 

OR (95%CI)

P

OR (95%CI)

P

OR (95%CI)

P

Continuous

CDAI

0.94(0.92,0.95)

<0.001

0.97(0.95,0.98)

<0.001

0.97(0.95,0.98)

0.001

Categories

Q1

Ref

-

Ref

-

Ref

-

Q2

0.81 (0.68,0.95)

0.013

0.91(0.76,1.08)

0.261

0.89(0.74,1.07)

0.221

Q3

0.69 (0.58,0.82)

<0.01

0.85(0.71,1.02)

0.089

0.87(0.72,1.06)

0.161

Q4

0.54 (0.45,0.65)

<0.01

0.74(0.61,0.89)

0.002

0.74(0.60,0.91)

0.004

P for trend

<0.001

0.002

0.005

Model 1 was adjusted for none; Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex and race; Model 3 was adjusted for age, sex, race, education, total cholesterol, Serum iron, BMI, folate, smoking, drinking, hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus. OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval; Ref=reference; BMI=body mass index; and CDAI=composite dietary antioxidant index.

Association between the components of the CDAI and anemia

We added a sensitive analysis on the association of the six components of the CDAI with anemia. As shown in Table 3, after adjusting for all variables, the association of the CDAI with anemia was driven by vitamins A (OR [95% CI]: 0.86 [0.76, 0.98]; P = 0.020), vitamins E (OR [95% CI]: 0.98 [0.98, 0.99]; P = 0.020), selenium(OR [95% CI]: 0.98 [0.97, 0.99]; P = 0.006) and Zinc (OR [95% CI]: 0.98 [0.96, 0.99]; P = 0.004). Further, restricted cubic spline suggested that the relationship between the CDAI and anemia was linear (P for nonlinearity = 0.154; Figure. 2A). At the same CDAI level, female have a higher risk of anemia than male (Figure. 2B).

Table 3: Association of six components of composite dietary antioxidant index and anemia.

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Components

OR (95%CI)

P

OR (95%CI)

P

OR (95%CI)

P

Vitamins A

0.81(0.72,0.93)

0.002

0.88(0.78,0.99)

0.037

0.86(0.76,0.98)

0.02

Vitamins C

1.00(0.99,1.01)

0.164

0.99(0.99,1.00)

0.135

1.00(0.99,1.01)

0.174

Vitamins E

0.98(0.97,0.99)

<0.001

0.98(0.97,0.99)

0.01

0.98(0.98,0.99)

0.02

Selenium

0.96(0.95,0.97)

<0.001

0.98(0.96,0.99)

0.001

0.98(0.97,0.99)

0.006

Carotenoid

0.99(0.98,0.99)

0.006

0.99(0.98,1.00)

0.045

1.00(0.99,1.02)

0.062

Zinc

0.96(0.94,0.97)

<0.001

0.98(0.97,0.99)

0.002

0.98(0.96,0.99)

0.004

Model 1 was adjusted for none; Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex and race; Model 3 was adjusted for age, sex, race, education, total cholesterol, Serum iron, BMI, folate, smoking, drinking, hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus. OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval; and BMI=body mass index.

fortune-biomass-feedstock

Figure 2: The dose-response relationship between the CDAI and anemia in total (A) and in female (red line and shadow) or male (purple line and shadow) (B). Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, education, total cholesterol, Serum iron, BMI, folate, smoking, drinking, hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and diabetes mellitus. BMI=body mass index; CDAI=composite dietary antioxidant index.

Subgroup analysis

To explore the interactive effects on the association, we conducted subgroup analysis through a series of strata variables and found that the association between the CDAI and anemia was consistent as shown in Figure. 3. The results indicated a stable negative association between the CDAI and anemia and the relationship showed no statistically significant differences in all groups (all P for interaction >0.05).

fortune-biomass-feedstock

Figure 3: Subgroup analysis for the association between the CDAI and anemia. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, education, total cholesterol, Serum iron, BMI, folate, smoking, drinking, hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus. The age, BMI, TC, folate were categorized into two subgroups by the median value. BMI=body mass index; TC=total cholesterol; and CDAI=composite dietary antioxidant index.

Roles of albumin played in the association between the CDAI and anemia

Table 4 showed the association between the CDAI and the albumin according to the linear regression. The results showed that higher CDAI were related to higher levels of albumin. Furthermore, we examined the mediating effects of albumin in the association between the CDAI and anemia as shown in Figure. 4, and the mediating effects of the albumin accounted for 42.91% of the total effects.

Table 4: Associations of CDAI with albumin.

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

CDAI

β(95%CI)

P

β(95%CI)

P

β(95%CI)

P

Q1

Ref

-

Ref

-

Ref

-

Q2

0.30(0.11,0.48)

0.002

0.08(-0.09,0.25)

0.369

0.004(-0.16,0.16)

0.963

Q3

0.66(0.47,0.84)

<0.001

0.25(0.08,0.42)

0.005

0.160(0.001,0.326)

0.048

Q4

1.08(0.90,1.27)

<0.001

0.36(0.19,0.54)

<0.001

0.190(0.03,0.36)

0.023

P for trend

<0.001

 

<0.001

 

0.002

 

Model 1 was adjusted for none; Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex and race; Model 3 was adjusted for age, sex, race, education, total cholesterol, Serum iron, BMI, folate, smoking, drinking, hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus. BMI=body mass index; OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval; and Ref=reference.

Figure 4: The association between CDAI and anemia mediated by albumin. TE=total effect; a*b=indirect effect; DE=direct effect. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Discussion

The key findings in the current study revealed that the CDAI was negatively associated with anemia (OR (95% CI, 0.97(0.95-0.98)), mainly driven by vitamins A, vitamins E, Selenium, and Zinc. This negative correlation was linear in a dose-response manner; the serum albumin could mediate this association, accounting for 42.91% (P < 0.001) of the total effects, as confirmed by the mediator analysis. According to our findings, there was a negative correlation between CDAI and anemia. The CDAI is a composite score to reflect individuals’ antioxidant status. The CDAI may theoretically hold greater significance than individual antioxidants, as it served as a key metric for dietary antioxidant capacity. Unlike single-dietary-antioxidant indicators, the CDAI better captured and reflected synergistic interactions among antioxidants, thereby facilitating a more comprehensive assessment of overall dietary quality [12]. Furthermore, oxidative stress in the body arises from the combined effects of multiple free radicals and oxidizing agents. Single-dietary-antioxidant indicators cannot fully reflect an organism's overall capacity to cope with oxidative stress. By integrating the intake of various dietary antioxidants, the CDAI provided a more accurate assessment of an individual's total dietary antioxidant potential and their ability to counteract cumulative oxidative load [13]. Accumulating evidence supports oxidative stress as a significant risk factor for anemia. The inhibition of oxidative stress could maintain redox homeostasis, thereby alleviating anemia [14]. Vitamin A promoted iron absorption and metabolism, thus playing a role in preventing anemia [15].The current study showed that vitamin A supplementation reduced the risk of anemia by 14% (OR= 0.86, 95%CI: 0.76 to 0.98, P = 0.020), lower than the reported risk reduction by 26% (OR= 0.74, 95%CI: 0.66 to 0.82, P< 0.001) by a meta-analysis. The studied participants could explain this difference: the meta-analysis included children and pregnant women, who were more likely to be influenced by vitamin A and the current study, however, included only adults, who were less likely influenced by vitamin A [16]. A positive relationship between the supplementation of vitamin E and elevated hemoglobin levels was revealed in mildly anemic adults (β = 0.983) [17], supporting our findings that vitamin E can reduce the risk of anemia. Vitamin E was considered to be an important lipophilic antioxidant in biological membranes, which can eliminate free radicals and act as a chain-breaking antioxidant. Severe vitamin E deficiency can lead to impaired immune response and free radical-induced hemolytic anemia [18]. Another study showed that anemia in patients with eating disorder was substantially correlated with zinc deficiency [19], which in turn supported that zinc could reduce the risk of anemia in the current study. What zinc supplementation can promote erythropoiesis confirmed in anemic rats may be a plausible explanation [20-22]. Zinc steady-state imbalance can cause a series of adverse reactions, such as increased oxidative stress, erythropoietin resistance and atherosclerosis [23]. The current study reported a significant, albeit slight, association of selenium with decreased risk of anemia (OR (95%CI), 0.98(0.98-0.99)), similar to previous reports (OR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.96-0.98, P < 0.001) [24]. The binding of selenium to selenoproteins prevented peroxidation and oxidative cell damage [25]. Previous studies have shown that selenium deficiency leads to macrocytic anemia, which was significantly improved by selenium supplementation [26]. However, these studies have focused exclusively on specific antioxidants and have not examined the potential synergistic effects between various antioxidant nutrients. The CDAI had a comprehensive effect on an individual's pro-antioxidant status and highlights the advantages of a comprehensive evaluation of antioxidant exposure.

Our findings indicated that after adjusting for multiple confounding factors, the association between vitamin C and carotenoids and anemia remained statistically insignificant. Possible explanations was that heterogeneity within the study population, including various types of anemia such as iron-deficiency and chronic disease-related anemia, may have diluted the effects of these components. Nevertheless, the significant negative correlation with CDAI overall suggested that vitamin C and carotenoids may contribute to anemia prevention through synergistic interactions with vitamins A, E, selenium, and zinc. As part of our investigation, we further explored the potential pathways that linked the CDAI to anemia. We found that the albumin mediated the relationship between the CDAI and anemia. Albumin, a major plasma protein synthesized by the liver, was influenced by dietary intake, particularly of proteins and micronutrients, and was commonly used as a biomarker of nutritional status. The CDAI, which reflected the intake of six dietary antioxidants (vitamins A, C, E, carotenoids, selenium, and zinc), may improve nutritional status by supporting metabolic processes, reducing oxidative stress, and enhancing protein synthesis, including that of albumin. Higher albumin levels were associated with reduced anemia risk, potentially due to the biochemical structure of albumin that made it a good indicator of oxidative stress in the circulatory system. As an extracellular antioxidant and major transport protein, albumin inhibited free radicals (oxidative stress) and alleviated anemia in patients through its antioxidant properties [27]. Thus, albumin may mediate the CDAI-anemia relationship by acting as both a nutritional marker and a functional contributor to redox homeostasis. A protective relationship between the albumin and anemia was found in our study, which was in agreement with the findings of a case-control study [28] and of a study of 80 years old and centenarians that a higher serum albumin concentration could reduce the risk of anemia [29].

There are several limitations to this study. First, due to its cross-sectional design, our findings should be considered as hypothesis-generating and were unable to make any causal inferences. Second, despite adjustment for many confounders, possible unmeasured confounders cannot be completely excluded. Third, the CDAI construction, which assessed dietary antioxidant capacity, considering only essential nutrients and carotenoids, may have overlooked other beneficial nutrients.

Conclusion

Our study highlighted a negative linear association between the CDAI and anemia in the general adults. Intake of the six dietary antioxidants composing the CDAI could help to prevent the occurrence of anemia.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all participants in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Noori M, et al. Burden of anemia and its underlying causes in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 [J]. J Hematol Oncol 14 (2019): 185.
  2. Bissinger R, Bhuyan AAM, Qadri SM, et al. Oxidative stress, eryptosis and anemia: a pivotal mechanistic nexus in systemic diseases [J]. Febs j 286 (2019): 826-854.
  3. Belini Junior E, da Silva DG, Torres Lde S, et al. Oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity in sickle cell anaemia patients receiving different treatments and medications for different periods of time [J]. Ann Hematol 91 (2012): 479-489.
  4. Engwa GA, Okolie A, Chidili JPC, et al. Relationship of oxidative stress and antioxidant response with vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell anaemia [J]. Afr Health Sci 21 (2021): 150-158.
  5. Daneshzad E, Keshavarz SA, Qorbani M, et al. Dietary total antioxidant capacity and its association with sleep, stress, anxiety, and depression score: A cross-sectional study among diabetic women [J]. Clin Nutr ESPEN 37 (2020): 187-194.
  6. Liu J, Tang Y, Peng B, et al. Bone mineral density is associated with composite dietary antioxidant index among US adults: results from NHANES [J]. Osteoporos Int 34 (2023): 2101-2110.
  7. Yu YC, Paragomi P, Wang R, et al. Composite dietary antioxidant index and the risk of colorectal cancer: Findings from the Singapore Chinese Health Study [J]. Int J Cancer 150 (2022): 1599-1608.
  8. Si T, Ma X, Zhu W, et al. Comment on: Association between anemia and depression: results from NHANES 2005-2018 and Mendelian randomization analyses [J]. Ann Hematol 103 (2024): 689-691.
  9. Chen X, Lu H, Chen Y, et al. Composite dietary antioxidant index was negatively associated with the prevalence of diabetes independent of cardiovascular diseases [J]. Diabetol Metab Syndr 15 (2023): 183.
  10. Chen Y, Tang W, Li H, et al. Composite dietary antioxidant index negatively correlates with osteoporosis among middle-aged and older US populations [J]. Am J Transl Res 15 (2023): 1300-1308.
  11. Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Du M, et al. Trends in Dietary Supplement Use Among US Adults From 1999-2012 [J]. Jama 316 (2016): 1464-1474.
  12. Zhao L, Sun Y, Cao R, et al. Non-linear association between composite dietary antioxidant index and depression [J]. Front Public Health 10 (2022): 988727.
  13. Meng Q, Dong S, Ge J, et al. Association between composite dietary antioxidant index and rheumatoid arthritis: results from NHANES 2003-2018 [J]. Int J Med Sci 22 (2025): 1184-1193.
  14. Cotoraci C, Ciceu A, Sasu A, et al. Natural Antioxidants in Anemia Treatment [J]. Int J Mol Sci 22 (2021).
  15. Cañete A, Cano E, Muñoz-Chápuli R, et al. Role of Vitamin A/Retinoic Acid in Regulation of Embryonic and Adult Hematopoiesis [J]. Nutrients 9 (2017).
  16. da Cunha MSB, Campos Hankins NA, Arruda SF. Effect of vitamin A supplementation on iron status in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59 (2019): 1767-1781.
  17. Jilani T, Azam I, Moiz B, et al. Positive Association of Vitamin E Supplementation with Hemoglobin Levels in Mildly Anemic Healthy Pakistani Adults [J]. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 85 (2015): 39-49.
  18. Jilani T, Iqbal MP. Vitamin E deficiency in South Asian population and the therapeutic use of alpha-tocopherol (Vitamin E) for correction of anemia [J]. Pak J Med Sci 34 (2018): 1571-1575.
  19. Nagata JM, Bojorquez-Ramirez P, Nguyen A, et al. Sex differences and associations between zinc deficiency and anemia among hospitalized adolescents and young adults with eating disorders [J]. Eat Weight Disord 27 (2022): 2911-2917.
  20. Chen YH, Feng HL, Jeng SS. Zinc Supplementation Stimulates Red Blood Cell Formation in Rats [J]. Int J Mol Sci 19 (2018).
  21. Feng HL, Chen YH, Jeng SS. Effect of Zinc Supplementation on Renal Anemia in 5/6-Nephrectomized Rats and a Comparison with Treatment with Recombinant Human Erythropoietin [J]. Int J Mol Sci 20 (2019).
  22. Chen YH, Jeng SS, Hsu YC, et al. In anemia zinc is recruited from bone and plasma to produce new red blood cells [J]. J Inorg Biochem 210 (2020): 111172.
  23. Greffeuille V, Fortin S, Gibson R, et al. Associations between Zinc and Hemoglobin Concentrations in Preschool Children and Women of Reproductive Age: An Analysis of Representative Survey Data from the Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammation and Nutritional Determinants of Anemia (BRINDA) Project [J]. J Nutr 151 (2021): 1277-1285.
  24. Zhou Q, Zhang B, Chen X, et al. Association of serum selenium with anemia-related indicators and risk of anemia [J]. Food Sci Nutr 9 (2021): 3039-3047.
  25. Ramakrishnan M, Arivalagan J, Satish L, et al. Selenium: a potent regulator of ferroptosis and biomass production [J]. Chemosphere 306 (2022): 135531.
  26. Nishi R, Sagiyama K, Hamada K, et al. Macrocytic anemia induced by selenium deficiency in the course of anorexia nervosa: A case report [J]. Medicine (Baltimore) 102 (2023): e36740.
  27. Nakatani S, Yasukawa K, Ishimura E, et al. Non-mercaptalbumin, Oxidized Form of Serum Albumin, Significantly Associated with Renal Function and Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients [J]. Sci Rep 8 (2018): 16796.
  28. Özcan O, Erdal H, İlhan G, et al. Plasma Ischemia-Modified Albumin Levels and Dynamic Thiol/Disulfide Balance in Sickle Cell Disease: A Case-Control Study [J]. Turk J Haematol 35 (2018): 265-270.
  29. Haslam A, Hausman DB, Johnson MA, et al. Prevalence and predictors of anemia in a population-based study of octogenarians and centenarians in Georgia [J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 67 (2012): 100-106.
Article Views
165
Total Views
Download PDF
Article Details
  • Volume9
  • Issue2
  • Pages248–255
  • Published17 Jun 2026
  • ISSN2644-2906
  • DOI10.26502/fjhs.417
Journal

Fortune Journal of Health Sciences

Impact Factor: 6.2
Submit Manuscript
© 2016–2026, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved.