Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment Strategies in the Prevention and Management of Metabolic Syndrome

Ritika Patial¹, Irene Batta², Manish Thakur³, Ranbir Chander Sobti⁴, Devendra K. Agrawal⁵*

¹Centre for System Biology & Bioinformatics, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

²Bothell High School, Bothell, Washington, USA

³School of Bioengineering & Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India

⁴Department of Biotechnology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

⁵Department of Translational Research, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California, USA

^*Corresponding author: Devendra K. Agrawal, MSc, PhD (Biochem), PhD (Med Sci), MBA, MS (ITM), FAAAAI, FAHA, FAPS, FIACS Professor and Director Department of Translational Research Western University of Health Sciences 309 E. Second Street, Pomona, California 91766-1854, USA.

Received: 17 October 2024; Accepted: 21 October 2024; Published: 28 October 2024

Introduction

Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), also referred to as Syndrome X or obesity syndrome, is a complex cluster of metabolic irregularities that significantly enhances the probability of developing chronic conditions, such as type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and other related disorders [1-3]. This syndrome is characterized by central obesity, high blood pressure, insulin resistance, high blood sugar, increased triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels [1,4]. Insulin resistance plays a crucial role in MetS, connecting it to various metabolic processes and conditions including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and hepatic steatosis [1,5,6]. The development of MetS involves genetic and acquired factors, resulting in a final pathway of inflammation that worsens the CVD risk [1-4]. Indeed, several findings in the literature suggest that the risk of developing MetS starts from very early age, influenced by several factors, including child maltreatment [7], social and environmental determinants [8], and systemic inflammatory diseases [9]. The prevalence of MetS is remarkably high, affecting approximately 25% of the global population, especially in developed nations where inactive lifestyles and high-calorie diets are prevalent.

This syndrome is not a singular ailment, but a combination of interconnected risk factors that usually manifest together, posing a significant public health issue [10,11]. The biochemical alterations seen in MetS, such as disturbances in glucose and lipid metabolism, immune response, endothelial cell function, and intestinal microbiota, establish pathological connections between MetS, diabetes, and cardiovascular and neurodegenerative conditions [1,12-14]. Indeed, the cardiac autonomic regulation worsens with the increase in the number of factors associated with MetS [15]. Despite its clinical importance, there is still discussion concerning the precise components and pathophysiological associations among the elements of MetS, limiting its effectiveness as a clinical tool [1,2,4]. Nevertheless, progress in the identification of biomarkers [16-18], therapeutic measures, including prescribed drugs and over-the-counter medicine [19-23], surgical choices like bariatric surgery, and experimental methods such as gene therapy, present hopeful strategies for handling and potentially reversing MetS [24-27]. The intricate nature of the syndrome is further emphasized by its close relationship with human behavior and evolution, highlighting the significance of diet, inflammation, and hormonal regulation in its onset and persistence [1,4,8]. Early identification and adjustments in lifestyle and control on the body weight are critical for reducing the health hazards associated with MetS, underscoring the necessity for a thorough understanding of its epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, and management approaches [11,28].

Importance of Studying Metabolic Syndrome

Detailed investigation of MetS is extremely important because of its significant implications for public health and its connection to severe health outcomes. It is characterized by a combination of metabolic disturbances, including central obesity, high blood pressure, hyperglycemia, abnormal lipid profiles, and insulin resistance, which collectively increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes, and other related disorders [1-4]. The prevalence of MetS is remarkably high and continues to increase globally, reflecting the obesity epidemic and sedentary lifestyles, with rates ranging from 44.9% in Japan to 50.9% in Spain [29]. This syndrome not only impacts individual health but also places a significant burden on healthcare systems and society, leading to higher disability and mortality rates. The association between MetS and cardiovascular disease is particularly concerning, as MetS significantly increases the chances of developing CVD and type II diabetes, highlighting the need for a thorough understanding of its risk factors and prevalence to guide effective prevention and management strategies [1,4-6]. Moreover, MetS is associated with various health issues, such as diabetes [1,30], acute coronary syndrome [31], thyroid sensitivity [32], rheumatoid arthritis [3], psoriasis vulgaris [33], musculoskeletal disorders [34], osteoarthritis [35], cognitive functions [36], Parkinson’s disease [37], and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [5,6], owing to dietary pattern and gut microbiota [10], and many biochemical and pathophysiological changes including hyperglycemia [1,16], hyperlipidemia [38-41], increased oxidative stress [42], systemic inflammation [5, 16-18], and autonomic dysregulation [15] . These co-morbidities, risk factors, and pathophysiological changes may trigger MetS.

The pathophysiology of MetS involves an intricate interplay between genetic, lifestyle, dietary, and environmental factors (Figure 1). A clear understanding these mechanisms is vital

Figure 1: Pathophysiology of metabolic syndrome. This figure illustrates the complex interplay between genetic, lifestyle, and dietary factors in the development of metabolic disorders, highlighting the cascade of physiological changes that lead to significant health conditions. RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

for creating successful prevention and treatment approaches. Additionally, MetS is linked to persistent low-grade inflammation and inflammatory cytokine activity, which leads to organ damage and elevated biomarkers in the bloodstream, underscoring the importance of better understanding inflammatory triggers and organ interference to identify therapeutic targets [16-27]. Public health efforts and personalized preventive measures are crucial in addressing the escalating prevalence of MetS, stressing the significance of promoting healthy lifestyles, including regular physical activity, balanced diets, and avoiding harmful habits such as smoking and excessive alcohol consumption [28]. Also, abdominal obesity could be interpreted as metabolically healthy or metabolically unhealthy obesity. Recent findings suggest that serum calcium levels could be used as a biomarker in the assessment and diagnosis of unhealthy versus healthy obesity [43].

Innovative therapeutic interventions, such as pharmacological treatments, surgical options such as bariatric surgery, and emerging experimental techniques such as gene therapy, present promising avenues for managing MetS and lessening its global impact [24,25]. The urgency of dealing with MetS is emphasized by its role as a critical precursor to major health conditions, requiring proactive measures to minimize its impact on public health and to protect the well-being of populations worldwide. Thus, comprehensive interdisciplinary approaches are necessary to effectively address this global health challenge, making the study of MetS a vital pursuit in contemporary healthcare research and practice.

Current Understanding of Metabolic Syndrome

A current understanding of metabolic syndrome is important because it allows healthcare professionals to stay updated on the latest research, diagnostic criteria, and treatment options. This knowledge is crucial for the accurate diagnosis, effective management, and prevention of complications associated with metabolic syndromes, such as heart disease, diabetes, and stroke. By staying informed with latest knowledge, healthcare providers can provide better care and support to individuals at risk or already diagnosed with metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, ongoing education and training in the field of metabolic syndromes enables healthcare professionals to implement evidence based practices and tailor interventions to meet the specific needs of each patient, ultimately improving outcomes and quality of life.

Etiology of Metabolic Syndrome

The origin of metabolic disorders is complex and involves genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors that disrupt the normal metabolic processes. Inherited metabolic disorders, also called inborn errors of metabolism, result from single-gene defects causing enzyme deficiencies, which disturb metabolic balance and lead to conditions such as gout, Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, and citrullinemia [44-46]. These disorders typically appear as abnormal chemical reactions in the body, affecting the metabolism of macronutrients, such as proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. Genetic mutations can also affect crucial regulatory pathways, such as the JAK-STAT signaling cascade, implicated in insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis, contributing to obesity and type 2 diabetes [48]. Environmental influences, such as poor dietary choices and sedentary lifestyles, worsen these conditions by upsetting metabolic equilibrium and generating harmful substances that may initiate disrupted metabolic signals, resulting in the pathogenesis of MetS [49,50]. Obesity, a major risk factor for metabolic disorders, interferes with intracellular insulin signaling by producing inflammatory substances and adipokines, resulting in insulin resistance, high blood sugar, high blood pressure, and abnormal lipid levels [1-3]. Additionally, oxidative stress, alterations in miRNA expression, and epigenetic changes are common pathological mechanisms underlying metabolic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and osteoporosis [37-41]. Research on rare monogenic disorders has shed light on the molecular basis of common metabolic syndromes, underscoring the impact of single-gene defects on severe obesity, early onset diabetes, and insulin resistance [44, 45]. Furthermore, chronic ailments such as osteomyelitis can disrupt metabolic balance by affecting the equilibrium between bone formation and breakdown, requiring etiopathogenetic therapy to address these metabolic disruptions and enhance treatment outcomes [51]. The accumulation of metabolites, such as hypoxanthine and citrulline, in amyloid structures highlights the intricate biochemical nature of metabolic disorders, indicating a shared etiological connection in IEMs and presents potential targets for therapeutic interventions [52].

Criteria Established for Metabolic Syndrome by Different Organizations

The assessment and diagnosis of metabolic diseases such as metabolic syndrome have been the subject of ongoing discussions and debates within the medical community. Various organizations have proposed criteria to help clinicians effectively identify and manage these complex conditions (Table 1).

Table 1: Criteria for metabolic syndrome defined by individual organization.

Insulin Resistance

Metabolic syndrome comprises a group of conditions that increase the likelihood of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. It is characterized by insulin resistance, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Insulin resistance, a fundamental element of metabolic syndrome, occurs when the cells of the body become less receptive to insulin, resulting in increased blood glucose levels [1-4]. The pathophysiology of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance involves an intricate interaction between genetic, environmental, and metabolic factors (Figure 1). One of the main mechanisms consists of the disruption of adipose tissue function. Adipose tissue, particularly visceral fat, is pivotal in insulin resistance development [53,54]. It releases various adipokines and cytokines that can trigger an inflammatory state, contributing to insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome [1-3]. Chronic inflammation significantly contributes to the development of insulin resistance. Inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, which are often elevated in obese individuals, hinder insulin signaling pathways, causing impaired glucose absorption by cells [55]. Oxidative stress worsens this inflammatory condition, which further harms cellular components and hampers normal metabolic processes [37,41]. Another crucial aspect is the involvement of the liver in metabolic syndromes. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is frequently linked to insulin resistance and is viewed as both a cause and consequence of metabolic syndrome. The inability of the liver to metabolize lipids effectively results in increased free fatty acids in the blood, which can worsen insulin resistance in peripheral tissues [5,6]. Genetic predisposition also influences insulin resistance and the development of metabolic syndrome. Specific genetic variations can affect insulin signaling pathways, lipid metabolism, and adipokine production, predisposing individuals to these conditions [44, 56]. Nonetheless, lifestyle elements, such as diet and physical activity, play a vital role in moderating these genetic risks. A sedentary lifestyle and a high-calorie diet can lead to obesity, which is a significant risk factor for insulin resistance [27]. The interaction between these elements establishes a harmful cycle in which insulin resistance leads to hyperinsulinemia, further boosting lipid accumulation and inflammation, thereby exacerbating insulin resistance. This cycle emphasizes the importance of early intervention through lifestyle adjustments, and when needed, pharmaceutical interventions to control and prevent the advancement of metabolic syndrome and its associated complications.

Dyslipidemia

Dyslipidemia, a critical element of metabolic syndrome, is characterized by irregular lipid levels in the bloodstream, including heightened triglycerides, reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and occasionally increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol [57]. Dyslipidemia in metabolic syndrome is influenced by intricate connections among genetic, environmental, and metabolic factors. The primary mechanism underlying dyslipidemia in metabolic syndrome is insulin resistance, a hallmark of the syndrome. Insulin resistance affects lipid metabolism by hindering the typical function of insulin in adipose tissue, leading to increased lipolysis and the discharge of free fatty acids into the bloodstream. This process contributes to the excessive production of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) in the liver, culminating in hypertriglyceridemia [58, 59]. Moreover, insulin resistance correlates with reduced activity of lipoprotein lipase, a critical enzyme for breaking down triglycerides in lipoproteins, thereby worsening hypertriglyceridemia [59]. Another notable aspect is the significance of adipokines, which are secreted by adipose tissue. In metabolic syndrome, there is frequently an imbalance in adipokines, including heightened levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), along with decreased levels of adiponectin, an anti-inflammatory cytokine [1-4]. This imbalance contributes to systemic inflammation, exacerbates insulin resistance, and perpetuates the dyslipidemia cycle. Genetic predisposition also plays a vital role in the onset of dyslipidemia in metabolic syndrome. Variations in genes related to lipid metabolism, such as those responsible for apolipoproteins and enzymes like hepatic lipase, can affect lipid levels and the likelihood of developing dyslipidemia [44]. Additionally, environmental factors, including diet and physical activity, substantially influence lipid profiles. Diets rich in saturated fats and sugars can worsen dyslipidemia, whereas routine physical activity can enhance lipid levels by boosting insulin sensitivity and facilitating triglyceride removal from the bloodstream [27]. Furthermore, oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathophysiology of dyslipidemia in metabolic syndrome. Elevated oxidative stress can trigger the oxidation of LDL particles, rendering them more atherogenic and contributing to the progression of atherosclerosis, a frequent complication of dyslipidemia [1,37]. Antioxidant defenses are frequently compromised in individuals with metabolic syndrome, which further intensifies oxidative damage and lipid irregularities [41].

Hypertension

Metabolic syndrome is defined by a group of conditions such as insulin resistance, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, which collectively increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes. One of the key mechanisms connecting metabolic syndrome to hypertension is insulin resistance, which is a key feature of metabolic syndrome that contributes to hypertension through multiple pathways. This leads to hyperinsulinemia, which can enhance sympathetic nervous system activity and encourage vasoconstriction and sodium retention, thereby increasing blood pressure (Figure 2) [60, 61]. Furthermore, insulin resistance hampers endothelial function, reducing the availability of nitric oxide, a potent vasodilator, which further contributes to increased vascular resistance and hypertension [62]. Obesity, especially visceral adiposity, is another crucial element in the pathophysiology of hypertension in metabolic syndrome. Excessive adipose tissue acts as an endocrine organ, releasing various adipokines and inflammatory cytokines that can impact blood pressure regulation. For example, elevated levels of leptin, an adipokine, can boost sympathetic nervous system activity, while reduced levels of adiponectin, which possesses anti-inflammatory and vasodilatory properties, are linked

Figure 2: Interconnected pathways of hypertension leading to metabolic disorders. The pathways highlight the role of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS), insulin resistance, obesity, and inflammation. These pathways collectively contribute to conditions like diabetes and cardiovascular complications.

to hypertension [1,63]. Additionally, obesity is associated with increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activity, which encourages sodium retention and vasoconstriction, contributing to elevated blood pressure [64]. Dyslipidemia, another component of the metabolic syndrome, also plays a role in the development of hypertension. High triglyceride and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels can result in endothelial dysfunction and increased arterial stiffness, both of which are associated with higher blood pressure [1]. Oxidative stress from dyslipidemia further worsens endothelial dysfunction and promotes hypertension [37,41]. Inflammation is a common underlying factor of metabolic syndrome that contributes to hypertension. Persistent low-grade inflammation, marked by elevated levels of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), is common in individuals with metabolic syndrome [65,66]. This inflammatory condition can lead to endothelial dysfunction and increased arterial stiffness, both of which are crucial for the pathogenesis of hypertension.

Obesity

The pathophysiology of obesity-related metabolic syndrome involves a complicated interaction between genetic, environmental, and physiological elements that leads to the onset of this condition. Metabolic syndrome is identified by a combination of factors that collectively increase the risk of heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes. At the core of the pathophysiology of metabolic syndrome, obesity is insulin resistance, a state in which the cells of the body exhibit reduced sensitivity to insulin, resulting in increased blood glucose levels. Insulin resistance is frequently worsened by obesity, especially visceral fat accumulation, which pertains to fat storage in the abdominal area. This fat is actively metabolized and releases free fatty acids, inflammatory cytokines, and various bioactive compounds that promote systemic inflammation and further insulin resistance [1,16]. Adipose tissue dysfunction is a crucial factor in the pathophysiology of obesity-related metabolic syndrome. In obese individuals, adipose tissue experiences both hypertrophy and hyperplasia, resulting in a disrupted secretion pattern of adipokines including leptin and adiponectin [1,63]. Leptin resistance, which is prevalent in obesity, hinders the regulation of hunger and energy balance, whereas lower levels of adiponectin correlate with heightened insulin resistance and inflammation. Chronic low-grade inflammation is also essential for the emergence of metabolic syndrome [63]. Obesity is linked to greater infiltration of immune cells, such as macrophages, into adipose tissue, which fosters a pro-inflammatory environment. Inflammation is associated with the onset of insulin resistance and various metabolic irregularities typical of metabolic syndrome [4]. Genetic predisposition is another element that affects the pathophysiology of metabolic syndrome. Specific genetic variations can influence fat distribution, insulin sensitivity, and lipid metabolism, making individuals more susceptible to metabolic syndrome [44]. Nonetheless, environmental factors, including diet and exercise, are equally important in moderating these genetic vulnerabilities. Additionally, gut microbiota has been recognized as a factor in the pathophysiology of metabolic syndrome obesity [10]. Dysbiosis, or an imbalance within the gut microbial ecosystem, can affect energy extraction from food, fat accumulation, and inflammation, thereby contributing to obesity and metabolic syndromes.

Complications Associated with Metabolic Syndrome

Metabolic syndrome, a cluster of conditions characterized by insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, has become increasingly prevalent in modern societies. These syndromes pose significant public health challenges, as they are associated with a three-fold increase in the risk of type 2 diabetes and a two-fold increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease.

1. Cardiovascular Diseases: Metabolic syndrome considerably increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This syndrome manifests as a blend of hypertension, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and central obesity, all of which are recognized risk factors for CVD. Research has revealed that those with metabolic syndrome exhibit a greater prevalence of atherosclerosis, potentially leading to coronary artery disease and other cardiovascular issues [1-3]. Inflammatory reactions and oxidative stress linked to metabolic syndrome further increase cardiovascular risk by fostering endothelial dysfunction and plaque buildup in the arteries [37,67,68].
2. Type 2 Diabetes: Type 2 diabetes is a significant complication associated with metabolic syndrome. Insulin resistance, a fundamental aspect of metabolic syndrome, is a precursor to the onset of type 2 diabetes. Research indicates that the presence of metabolic syndrome markedly increases the chance of developing type 2 diabetes due to disrupted glucose metabolism and pancreatic beta-cell failure [1-4]. The persistent low-grade inflammation found in metabolic syndrome also plays a role in the development of type 2 diabetes by hindering insulin signaling pathways.
3. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD): NAFLD is closely associated with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance is pivotal to its pathophysiology. The buildup of fat within liver cells, a defining feature of NAFLD, is frequently observed in individuals with metabolic syndrome due to unregulated lipid metabolism [5, 6]. NAFLD has the potential to evolve into more severe liver diseases, including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The occurrence of NAFLD is significantly greater among patients with metabolic syndrome, highlighting the necessity for timely detection and management of metabolic risk factors to avert liver-related complications [5].
4. Stroke: Stroke is another serious complication associated with metabolic syndrome. The likelihood of both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes escalates in individuals with metabolic syndrome owing to the cumulative effects of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycemia, all of which contribute to cerebrovascular harm. The pro-thrombotic condition instigated by metabolic syndrome further increases the risk of stroke by facilitating clot formation in the cerebral arteries [69-71]. Moreover, the inflammatory environment associated with metabolic syndrome can result in vascular remodeling and heightened arterial stiffness, which further increases the risk of stroke.

Management and Treatment Strategies

Management and treatment strategies for a range of health conditions include lifestyle changes, pharmacological therapies, and surgical procedures. Each method presents unique advantages and obstacles, and its effectiveness may differ depending on the conditions being addressed.

1. Lifestyle Interventions: Lifestyle modifications are essential for the management of chronic diseases, especially those associated with metabolic health. These changes usually involve alterations in diet, increased physical activity, and behavioral shifts. For example, research underscores the significance of dietary modifications in managing metabolic syndrome, highlighting how a balanced diet abundant in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains can enhance metabolic health indicators [27]. Furthermore, engaging in regular physical exercise is vital for tackling obesity and related issues as it aids in weight loss and promotes better cardiovascular health [29]. Behavioral strategies, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, can also facilitate lifestyle changes by overcoming psychological obstacles to a healthier living [35].
2. Pharmacological Interventions: Pharmacological therapies are frequently utilized when lifestyle adjustments alone are insufficient. These treatments can focus on pathways involved in disease mechanisms. For instance, in addressing type 2 diabetes, drugs, such as metformin and insulin, are commonly prescribed to manage blood glucose levels. Likewise, antihypertensive medications play a crucial role in controlling high blood pressure, thereby lowering the risk of cardiovascular incidents [29]. The selection of pharmacological options depends on the patient's overall health status, severity of the condition, and potential side effects. It is vital to customize these treatments to meet individual requirements to enhance their effectiveness and reduce adverse effects [27].
3. Surgical Interventions: Surgical procedures are generally considered when other treatment options are ineffective or immediate action is required. For example, bariatric surgery is a recognized intervention for severe obesity and has demonstrated significant weight loss and improvement in obesity-related health issues. This procedure is particularly advantageous for individuals who have not achieved their desired results through lifestyle changes and pharmacological therapies. However, surgical alternatives carry inherent risks and require careful patient selection and postoperative care to ensure long-term success [72].
4. Integration and Considerations: Combining various strategies, as discussed above, often leads to the most favorable outcomes. For instance, merging lifestyle changes with pharmacological therapies can improve the management of chronic ailments, such as diabetes and hypertension. Additionally, presurgical lifestyle alterations can enhance surgical results and lower complications [27]. When formulating a treatment strategy, it is essential to consider patient preferences, possible side effects, and overall effect on quality of life.

Emerging Research and Future Directions

Emerging investigations into innovative therapeutic targets, personalized medical strategies, and preventive measures are rapidly advancing, presenting promising avenues for future improvements in health care.

1. Innovative Therapeutic Targets: Recent investigations have uncovered numerous innovative therapeutic targets with the potential to transform treatment approaches. For example, some studies have underscored the significance of targeting specific molecular pathways that play a role in disease progression. One study highlighted the importance of certain proteins in cardiovascular illnesses, indicating that altering these proteins could create new therapeutic pathways [73,74]. Likewise, another study examined the discovery of distinct biomarkers in neurological conditions, which could act as targets for groundbreaking drug development [75,76]. These discoveries emphasize the necessity of comprehending disease mechanisms at the molecular level to create targeted therapies that are not only more effective, but also present fewer side effects.
2. Personalized Medical Strategies: Personalized medicine is increasingly being recognized as a revolutionary approach in healthcare, concentrating on customizing treatments based on individual patient attributes. Progress in genomics and bioinformatics has enabled the development of personalized treatment strategies. For instance, research has illustrated the effectiveness of genetic profiling in forecasting patient reactions to treatment in cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndrome, thus enhancing treatment effectiveness while reducing adverse effects [77,78]. Furthermore, personalized medical strategies are being investigated in the management of chronic diseases, where patient-specific information is utilized to tailor treatment plans, leading to improved outcomes and higher patient satisfaction. These methodologies highlight the transition towards more individualized care, which is anticipated to bolster the accuracy and efficacy of medical interventions.
3. Preventive Measures: Preventive measures are vital for diminishing the occurrence and impact of diseases. Recent studies have focused on lifestyle changes and early interventions as essential elements of effective prevention strategies. Research has indicated that actions such as dietary modifications, increased physical activity, and smoking cessation can substantially lower the risk of developing chronic illnesses, such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases [79]. Additionally, public health efforts aimed at raising awareness and educating communities about preventive practices have been effective in fostering healthier behaviors among populations [80-82]. These strategies underscore the significance of proactive health management and the role of preventive care in enhancing public health outcomes

Conclusion

Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of metabolic abnormalities that significantly increases the risk of chronic conditions, such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and other related disorders. It affects approximately 25% of the global population and is characterized by central obesity, high blood pressure, insulin resistance, high blood sugar, increased triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. Studying and understanding MetS is crucial because of its significant public health implications and connection with severe health outcomes. MetS is associated with various health issues such as diabetes, neurodegenerative disorders, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The pathophysiology of MetS involves the interplay of genetic and environmental factors, and understanding these mechanisms is vital for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies. Public health efforts and personalized preventive measures are essential for addressing the increasing prevalence of MetS. A current understanding of MetS is important for healthcare professionals to provide accurate diagnosis, effective management, and prevention of complications associated with MetS.

Funding:

The research work of DKA is supported by the research grants R01 HL144125 and R01HL147662 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA. The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Institutional Review Board Statement:

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement:

Not applicable

Data Availability Statement:

Not applicable since the information is gathered from published articles.

Acknowledgments:

None

Conflicts of Interest:

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

1. Satish M, Saxena SK, Agrawal DK: Adipokine Dysregulation and Insulin Resistance with Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: Metabolic Syndrome or Independent Sequelae? J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2019 Oct; 12 (2019): 415-424.
2. Madan K, Paliwal S, Sharma S, et al: Metabolic Syndrome: The Constellation of Co-morbidities, A Global Threat. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2023; 23 (2023): 1491-1504.
3. Zhou Y, Gao J: Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from the NHANES 1999-2018. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 15 (2024): 1444800.
4. Alemany M: The Metabolic Syndrome, a Human Disease. Int J Mol Sci 25 (2024): 2251.
5. Radwan MM, Radwan BM, Nandipati KC, et al: Immunological and molecular basis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 9 (2013): 727-738.
6. Ma X, Ji B, Du W, Shi S, et al: METS-IR, a Novel Simple Insulin Resistance Index, is Associated with NAFLD in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 17 (2024): 3481-3490.
7. Osode E, Cook E, Tomlin A: Child Maltreatment and Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 17 (2024): 3163-3176.
8. Vieira de Oliveira Salerno PR, Cotton A, Elgudin YE, et al. Social and Environmental Determinants of Health and Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome-Related Mortality. JAMA Netw Open 7 (2024): e2435783.
9. Wei H, Xu D, Chen J, et al: Age difference in the connection between systemic inflammatory response and metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 25 (2024): dgae669.
10. Dalamaga M, Tsigalou C: Diet patterns, gut microbiota and metabolic disorders: Perspectives and challenges. Metabol Open 23 (2024): 100310.
11. de Luis Román D, Primo D, Izaola Jáuregui O, et al: Weight-adjusted waist index predicts metabolic syndrome in Caucasian patients with obesity. Nutr Hosp 19 (2024).
12. Malicevic U, Rai V, Skrbic R, et al. NLRP3 Inflammasome and Gut Dysbiosis Linking Diabetes Mellitus and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Arch Intern Med Res 7 (2024): 200-218.
13. Swier VJ, Tang L, Radwan MM, et al: The role of high cholesterol-high fructose diet on coronary arteriosclerosis. Histol Histopathol 31 (2016): 167-176.
14. Boosani CS, Gunasekar P, Agrawal DK: An update on PTEN modulators - a patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat 29 (2019): 881-889.
15. Lucini D, Giovanelli L, Malacarne M, et al: Progressive Impairment of Cardiac Autonomic Regulation as the Number of Metabolic Syndrome Components Increases. J Obes Metab Syndr 33 (2024): 229-239.
16. Pelham CJ, Agrawal DK: Emerging roles for triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells receptor family signaling in inflammatory diseases. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 10 (2014): 243-256.
17. Subramanian S, Pallati PK, Rai V, et al: Increased expression of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 in the population with obesity and insulin resistance. Obesity (Silver Spring) 25 (2017): 527-538.
18. Qin Y, Yao S, Wang G, et al: The Gastric Connection: Serum Gastric Biomarkers, Metabolic Syndrome and Transition in Metabolic Status. J Inflamm Res 17 (2024): 6439-6452.
19. Pelham CJ, Drews EM, Agrawal DK: Vitamin D controls resistance artery function through regulation of perivascular adipose tissue hypoxia and inflammation. J Mol Cell Cardiol 98 (2016): 1-10.
20. Chen S, Villalta SA, Agrawal DK: FOXO1 Mediates Vitamin D Deficiency-Induced Insulin Resistance in Skeletal Muscle. J Bone Miner Res 31 (2016): 585-595.
21. Chen S, Sun Y, Agrawal DK: Vitamin D deficiency and essential hypertension. J Am Soc Hypertens 9 (2015): 885-901.
22. Shofler D, Rai V, Mansager S, et al: Impact of resolvin mediators in the immunopathology of diabetes and wound healing. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 17 (2021): 681-690.
23. Wells IC, Agrawal DK, Anderson RJ: Abnormal magnesium metabolism in etiology of salt-sensitive hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biol Trace Elem Res 98 (2004): 97-108.
24. Agrawal DK, Boosani CS: Gene therapy to keep the QT rhythms "on the QT". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 154 (2017): 1641-1643.
25. Hall S, Agrawal DK: Delivery of viral vectors for gene therapy in intimal hyperplasia and restenosis in atherosclerotic swine. Drug Deliv Transl Re 8 (2018): 918-927.
26. Karagiannis AD, Liu M, Toth PP, et al: Pleiotropic Anti-atherosclerotic Effects of PCSK9 InhibitorsFrom Molecular Biology to Clinical Translation. Curr Atheroscler Rep 20 (2018): 20.
27. Boosani CS, Gunasekar P, Block M, et al: Inhibition of DNA methyltransferase-1 instigates the expression of DNA methyltransferase-3a in angioplasty-induced restenosis. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 96 (2018): 1030-1039.
28. Maitland SB, Brauer P, Mutch DM, et al: Exploratory analysis of the variable response to an intensive lifestyle change program for metabolic syndrome. BMC Prim Care 25 (2024): 357.
29. Agarkov NM, Titov AA, Korneeva SI, et al: Metabolic syndrome as an actual health problem (analytical review). Health Care of the Russian Federation 67 (2023): 136-141.
30. Lu X, Xie Q, Pan X, et al: Type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: pathogenesis, prevention and therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther 9 (2024): 262.
31. Wu H, Yin Y, Lei F, et al. Influence of metabolic syndrome on plaque features and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Clin Res Cardiol 16 (2024).
32. Deng Q, Deng J, Wei X, et al: Associations between peripheral thyroid sensitivity and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the US adults with metabolic syndrome. Front Med (Lausanne) 11 (2024): 1460811.
33. Etgü F, Dervis E: Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Patients with Psoriasis Vulgaris: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus 16 (2024): e68037.
34. Shi Y, Li S, Xie X, et al: Association between Metabolic Syndrome and Musculoskeletal Status: A Cross-Sectional Study of NHANES. Int J Endocrinol 21 (2024): 7330133.
35. Szilagyi IA, Nguyen NL, Boer CG, et al: Metabolic syndrome, radiographic osteoarthritis progression and chronic pain of the knee among men and women from the general population: The Rotterdam study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 69 (2024):152544.
36. Frentz I, Marcolini S, Schneider CCI, et al: Metabolic Syndrome Status Changes and Cognitive Functioning: Insights from the Lifelines Cohort Study. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 11 (2024): 1283-1290.
37. Zhong Y, Wang TH, Huang LJ, et al: Association between metabolic syndrome and the risk of Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. BMC Neurol 24 (2024): 313.
38. Velpuri P, Patel P, Yazdani A, et al. Increased Oxidative Stress and Decreased Sirtuin-3 and FOXO3 Expression Following Carotid Artery Intimal Injury in Hyperlipidemic Yucatan Microswine. Cardiol Cardiovasc Med 8 (2024): 33-42.
39. Rai V, Agrawal DK. Immunomodulation of IL-33 and IL-37 with Vitamin D in the Neointima of Coronary Artery: A Comparative Study between Balloon Angioplasty and Stent in Hyperlipidemic Microswine. Int J Mol Sci 22 (2021): 8824.
40. Rai V, Dietz NE, Dilisio MF, et al. Vitamin D attenuates inflammation, fatty infiltration, and cartilage loss in the knee of hyperlipidemic microswine. Arthritis Res Ther 18 (2016): 203.
41. Lal L P MR, Agrawal DK. Hyperlipidemia Induced Pathological Changes with no Effect in Biomechanical Properties in the Achilles Tendon of Young Swine. J Orthop Sports Med 6 (2024): 67-72.
42. Martemucci G, Fracchiolla G, Muraglia M, et al: Metabolic Syndrome: A Narrative Review from the Oxidative Stress to the Management of Related Diseases. Antioxidants (Basel) 12 (2023): 2091.
43. Li Z, Yao Z, Liu Q: Association of serum calcium and metabolically healthy obese in US adults: a cross-sectional study. Ann Med 56 (2024): 2403721.
44. Moon KW, Jung SH, Do H, et al: Cardiovascular risk according to genetic predisposition to gout, lifestyle and metabolic health across prospective European and Korean cohorts. RMD Open 10 (2024): e004552.
45. Colpaert M, Singh PK, Donohue KJ, et al: Neurological glycogen storage diseases and emerging therapeutics. Neurotherapeutics 21 (2024): e00446.
46. Patel M, Jaiswal A, Naseer A, et al: Amyloidogenic Propensity of Metabolites in the Uric Acid Pathway and Urea Cycle Critically Impacts the Etiology of Metabolic Disorders. ACS Chem Neurosci 15 (2024): 916-931.
47. Lecoq AL, Schilbach K, Rocher L, et al: Metabolically healthy obesity in adults with X-linked hypophosphatemia. Eur J Endocrinol 191 (2024): 156-165.
48. Karin M, Kim JY: MASH as an emerging cause of hepatocellular carcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives. Mol Oncol 14 (2024).
49. Roddick C, Harris M, Hofman PL. The Metabolic Programming of Pubertal Onset. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 3 (2024).
50. Engin A: The Definition and Prevalence of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome: Correlative Clinical Evaluation Based on Phenotypes. Adv Exp Med Biol 1460 (2024): 1-25.
51. Liu HZ, Liang J, Hu AX: Type 2 diabetes mediates the causal relationship between obesity and osteomyelitis: A Mendelian randomization study. Medicine (Baltimore) 103 (2024): e38214.
52. Patel M, Jaiswal A, Naseer A, et al: Amyloidogenic Propensity of Metabolites in the Uric Acid Pathway and Urea Cycle Critically Impacts the Etiology of Metabolic Disorders. ACS Chem Neurosci 15 (2024): 916-931.
53. Shi J, Chen Z, Zhang Y: Associations between body fat anthropometric indices and mortality among individuals with metabolic syndrome. Lipids Health Dis 23 (2024): 306.
54. Savas OA, Erbil Y: Unlocking the secrets of metabolic syndrome: retroperitoneal fat area as a novel predictor. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 28 (2024): 4255-4263.
55. Kelly SC, Higgins CB, Sun J, et al: Hepatocyte MMP14 mediates liver and inter-organ inflammatory responses to diet-induced liver injury. PNAS Nexus 3 (9): page357.
56. Aliyu U, Umlai UI, Toor SM, et al: Genome-wide association study and polygenic score assessment of insulin resistance. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 15 (2024): 1384103.
57. Martiniakova M, Mondockova V, Kovacova V, et al: Interrelationships among metabolic syndrome, bone-derived cytokines, and the most common metabolic syndrome-related diseases negatively affecting bone quality. Diabetol Metab Syndr 16 (2024): 217.
58. Fu ZH, Zhao ZY, Liang YB, et al: Impact of metabolic syndrome components on clinical outcomes in hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 30 (2024): 3996-4010.
59. Shang Y, Grip ET, Modica A, et al: Metabolic Syndrome Traits Increase the Risk of Major Adverse Liver Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 47 (2024): 978-985.
60. Patel M, Braun J, Lambert G, et al. Central mechanisms in sympathetic nervous dysregulation in obesity: J Neurophysiol 130 (2023): 1414-1424.
61. Moon S, Park Y, Jang S, et al: Interleukin-2 improves insulin sensitivity through hypothalamic sympathetic activation in obese mice. J Neuroinflammation 21 (2024): 250.
62. Sanchez RA, Sanchez MJ, Pessana F, et al: Insulin resistance is associated to future hypertension in normotensive salt-sensitive individuals: a 10-year follow-up study. J Hypertens 42 (2024): 1915-1921.
63. Golanska-Wróblewska M, Fryczak J, Siejka A: Serum levels of sirtuins, leptin and adiponectin in women with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Cytokine 179 (2024): 156612.
64. Hundemer GL, Agharazii M, Madore F, et al: Sex-Specific Associations of Aldosterone and Renin with Body Composition: A Population-Based Cohort Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 16 (2024) : dgae566.
65. Adams-Huet B, Jialal I: An Increasing Triglyceride-Glucose Index Is Associated with a Pro-Inflammatory and Pro-Oxidant Phenotype. J Clin Med 13 (2024): 3941.
66. Zahedi AS, Daneshpour MS, Akbarzadeh M, et al: Association of baseline and changes in adiponectin, homocysteine, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 levels and metabolic syndrome incidence: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Heliyon 9 (2023): e19911.
67. Trinh J, Shin J, Rai V, et al: Targeting Oncostatin M Receptor to Attenuate Carotid Artery Plaque Vulnerability in Hypercholesterolemic Microswine. Cardiol Cardiovasc Med 8 (2024): 206-214.
68. Trinh J, Shin J, Rai V, Agrawal DK: Therapeutic Potential of Targeting p27kip1 in Plaque Vulnerability. Arch Intern Med Res 7 (2024): 73-79.
69. Ahmed Z, Chaudhary F, Agrawal DK: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Current Treatment Strategies in Stroke. Cardiol Cardiovasc Med. 8 (2024): 389-404.
70. Noothi SK, Ahmed MR, Agrawal DK: Residual risks and evolving atherosclerotic plaques. Mol Cell Biochem 478 (2023): 2629-2643.
71. Lopes LA, Agrawal DK: Thromboembolism in the Complications of Long COVID-19. Cardiol Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 7 (2023): 123-128.
72. Forbes H, He W, Dharmasena I, et al: Bariatric surgery decreases prescription drug costs for metabolic syndrome: a Canadian population-based cohort study. Surg Endosc 30 (2024).
73. Kufazvinei TTJ, Chai J, Boden KA, et al: Emerging opportunities to target inflammation: myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Res 120 (2024): 1241-1252.
74. Minami Y, Ako J, Tsujita K, et al: Drug intervention as an emerging concept for secondary prevention in patients with coronary disease. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 39 (2024): 223-233.
75. Mansouri E, Asghari S, Nikooei P, et al: Effects of virgin coconut oil consumption on serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels and oxidative stress biomarkers in adults with metabolic syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Nutr Neurosci 27 (2024): 487-498.
76. Kirlioglu Balcioglu SS, Kurt Sabitay I, Uysal A, et al: Evaluation of changes in carbonyl stress markers with treatment in male patients with bipolar disorder manic episode: A controlled study. J Affect Disord 362 (2024): 1-8.
77. Xie Q, Zhang X, Liu F, et al: Identification and verification of immune-related genes for diagnosing the progression of atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 24 (2024): 405.
78. Kim JY, Cho YS. Identification of shared genetic risks underlying metabolic syndrome and its related traits in the Korean population. Front Genet 15 (2024): 1417262.
79. Kim HJ, Cho YJ: Smoking cessation and risk of metabolic syndrome: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 103 (2024): e38328.
80. Maitland SB, Brauer P, Mutch DM, et al: Exploratory analysis of the variable response to an intensive lifestyle change program for metabolic syndrome. BMC Prim Care 25 (2024): 357.
81. Saenz C, Salinas M, Rothman RL, et al: Personalized Lifestyle Modifications for Improved Metabolic Health: The Role of Cultural Sensitivity and Health Communication in Type 2 Diabetes Management. J Am Nutr Assoc 14 (2024): 1-14.
82. Vafiadaki E, Turnbull IC, Sanoudou D: Therapeutic Targets and Personalized Medicine in Cardiac Disease. J Pers Med 13 (2023): 1534.