Samantha Perry1, Lekha Pillarisetti1, Tamara Gelfman1, Devendra K. Agrawal1*
1Department of Translational Research, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California 91766 USA
*Corresponding author: Devendra K. Agrawal, MSc, PhD (Biochem), PhD (Med Sci), MBA, MS (ITM), FAAAAI, FAHA, FAPS, FIACS Director and Professor, Department of Translational Research, Western University of Health Sciences 309 E. Second Street, Pomona, California 91766, USA
Received: 01 December 2025; Accepted: 08 December 2025; Published: 10 December 2025
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract driven by complex interactions between genetic susceptibility, environmental triggers, microbial dysbiosis, and immune dysregulation. The gut microbiome, composed primarily of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, plays a crucial role in maintaining intestinal barrier integrity, immune balance, and neuroimmune signaling. Disruption of this microbial ecosystem is characterized by loss of beneficial short chain fatty acid producing bacteria and expansion of pathogenic species which promotes mucosal inflammation, cytokine release, and neuroimmune signaling that can disrupt mental health through the gut-brain axis. Emerging evidence links microbial metabolites, vagal tone, and the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal axis in a feedback loop that perpetuates inflammation and alters mood regulation. Current therapeutic approaches include diet modification, osteopathic manipulative treatments, fecal microbiota transplantation and phage therapy. This article focuses on understanding mechanisms linking dysbiosis, immune activation, and neuroinflammation to guide future interventions. A holistic model addressing the gut-brain axis holds the greatest promise for improving outcomes and personalizing care for IBD.
Dysbiosis; Fetal microbiota transplantation; Gut-brain axis; Inflammatory Bowel Disease; Microbiome; Neuroimmune signaling; Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine; Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
Dysbiosis articles; Fetal microbiota transplantation articles; Gut-brain axis articles; Inflammatory Bowel Disease articles; Microbiome articles; Neuroimmune signaling articles; Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine articles; Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment articles
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) represents a chronic, relapsing inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract with significant physical and psychological effects. IBD can have genetic predispositions and environmental triggers that can cause gut microbial imbalances and immune dysregulation [1]. Despite therapeutic advances, disease heterogeneity and unpredictable relapsing complicates management. Studies have shown that both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, the major forms of IBD, are associated with disruptions to the intestinal epithelium and mucosal immunity that promote sustained inflammation and systemic immune activation [2]. Beyond gut disorders, studies have also shown that SARS-CoV-2–induced ACE2 dysregulation disrupts gut microbiota and the renin–angiotensin system, driving inflammation and neurological dysfunction that contribute to long COVID symptoms [3-7].
Central to IBD pathophysiology is gut microbiome ‘dysbiosis’ which can alter intestinal permeability, immune signaling, and barrier integrity [8]. In healthy individuals, the gut microbiome is predominantly composed of the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, which generate short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as butyrate and propionate critical for energy provision and immune regulation. Dysbiosis, characterized by altered microbial diversity and composition, is closely associated with IBD pathogenesis, as evidenced by both experimental models and clinical observations [9]. Loss of anti-inflammatory species and increased pathogenic bacteria heighten mucosal dysfunction and systemic inflammation [10]. In IBD patients, microbial community shifts are evident, marked by a reduction in beneficial Firmicutes, including Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Roseburia hominis, alongside an increase in potentially pathogenic Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. This dysbiotic state correlates with diminished SCFA production and impaired microbial diversity, compromising intestinal barrier function and promoting inflammation. Pathogenic species such as adherent-invasive Escherichia coli, Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis, and Listeria monocytogenes have been implicated in disease exacerbation [9]. Whether dysbiosis is the driver of inflammation or result of it remains a central question, but interventional studies with fecal microbiota transplantation and probiotics point to their interrelatedness [8].
Emerging research incorporates the gut–brain axis into IBD frameworks to explain the high rates of mood and cognitive disorders seen in patients [11]. Neuroimmune signaling, vagal pathways, and stress-driven hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) activation connect gut inflammation to altered brain function and behavior [1]. Circulating cytokines and microbial metabolites can affect glial and neural pathways, linking intestinal pathology to depression, anxiety, and cognitive deficits [2]. Thus, understanding the molecular and inflammatory relationship between the gut and brain provides a foundation for IBD management that targets microbiota composition, immune modulation, and psychological health.
The pathogenesis of IBD results from the convergence of host genetic susceptibility, environmental triggers, immune dysregulation, and microbial perturbation. Genome-wide association studies have identified more than 240 IBD-related loci, many of which encode proteins involved in innate immune sensing, epithelial barrier function, and autophagy [12]. Genes such as NOD2, ATG16L1, CDC42, and ORMDL3 contribute to microbial recognition and mucosal homeostasis; their dysregulation promotes exaggerated immune responses to commensal bacteria [13,14]. Recent work from Agrawal and colleagues highlights CDC42 and ORMDL3 regulatory patterns as potential therapeutic targets for controlling mucosal and metabolic inflammation in IBD [13,15,16].
Environmental influences– diet, antibiotic exposure, infections, early-life microbial colonization– further shape disease risk by altering microbial composition and immune tolerance [17]. Diets low in fiber and high in animal fat reduce microbial diversity and the production of anti-inflammatory SCFAs such as butyrate, propionate, and acetate. Conversely, plant-based diets enrich SCFA-producing genera and support epithelial barrier integrity [18]. Bacaloni and Agrawal emphasized how nutritional patterns and epigenetic modification jointly modulate the microbiota and immune signaling, illustrating how diet serves as a bridge between genetic predisposition and immune activation [19].
Immunologically, IBD involves chronic activation of Th1/Th17 responses, inflammasome signaling, and impaired regulatory T-cell activity. The NLRP3 inflammasome, in particular, connects dysbiosis and metabolic inflammation to intestinal and systemic pathologies [20]. Malicevic and colleagues demonstrated that NLRP3 activation contributes to both IBD and diabetes via gut microbial alterations, suggesting a shared inflammatory circuitry [15,16]. Such systemic inflammation has neuropsychiatric consequences: cytokines like IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β cross the blood-brain barrier, modulate neurotransmitter metabolism, and induce microglial activation, contributing to mood disorders [21].
In both IBD and IBS, epithelial barrier breakdown permits translocation of bacterial antigens and metabolites, stimulating mucosal and systemic inflammation [22]. Microbial components activate pattern recognition receptors (TLR4, NOD2) and inflammasomes, generating pro-inflammatory cytokines that act on the CNS. These cytokines alter neuronal plasticity and neurotransmission, paralleling mechanisms observed in major depressive disorder [23].
The vagus nerve provides a rapid conduit between gut and brain. Vagal afferents detect microbial metabolites and inflammatory mediators, influencing limbic circuits regulating mood. Reduced vagal tone–common in IBD and chronic stress– is linked to greater anxiety and depressive symptoms [24]. In parallel, activation of the HPA axis elevates cortisol, disrupts barrier function, and modifies microbial composition, creating a feedback loop between stress and inflammation [25].
Microbial metabolites such as SCFAa, secondary bile acids, and tryptophan derivatives modulate CNS function. Dysbiosis in IBD/IBS decreases SCFA production, compromising energy supply to colonocytes and anti-inflammatory signaling [26]. Altered bile acid metabolism impacts farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and TGR5 pathways, which influence mood and cognition.
A critical biochemical node is the tryptophan-kynurenine pathway. Inflammatory activation diverts tryptophan metabolism away from serotonin synthesis towards kynurenine and quinolinic acid, both of which can be neurotoxic [27]. This shift contributes to depressive phenotypes in inflammatory states. Experimental manipulation of gut microbiota in rodents modulates tryptophan metabolism and behavioral outcomes, underscoring causality [28].
Peripheral inflammation signals to the brain through cytokines and microglia. Chronic exposure leads to sustained microglial activation and reduced neurogenesis in the hippocampus– pathophysiological hallmarks of depression [29]. Animal models of colitis show that microbial or cytokine modulation can reverse these CNS changes [30].
The mystery of whether dysbiosis causes intestinal inflammation or results from it remains unsolved. Longitudinal and gnobiotic studies offer clues. In germ-free mice colonized with microbiota from IBD patients, recipients develop low-grade inflammation and anxiety-like behaviors, implying a causal role for microbial factors [31]. Conversely, induction of colitis alters microbial communities, supporting a bidirectional model [32].
Human cohort studies show that microbial diversity reduction often precedes clinical flares in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, predicting relapse risk [33]. Similarly, in intestinal bowel syndrome (IBS), psychosocial stress and altered gut-brain signaling precede dysbiosis, suggesting a top-down component [34]. Therefore, the relationship is circular: inflammation modifies the microbiota, which in turn perpetuates inflammation and psychological distress.
Emerging data from other inflammatory conditions reinforce this model. Pathak and Agrawal’s article of long-COVID described gut microbial perturbations correlating with neuropsychiatric symptoms, mirroring gut-brain-immune dynamics of IBD [3-7]. Such parallels support a systems-level view in which dysbiosis and chronic inflammation drive multi-organ consequences, including mental health changes.
Probiotics and Prebiotics
A probiotic is a live microorganism while a prebiotic is a non-digestible food ingredient that selectively stimulates the growth of beneficial microorganisms in the gut. A heavily interconnected network that frames a major component of the gut-brain axis is the gut microbiota, making it a reasonable target for therapy. In COVID-19 patients, there was a statistically significant improvement in remission rate in probiotic treated patients compared to controls [35]. Prebiotics such as lactulose, lactosucrose, oligofructose, and inulin have been found to induce the growth of certain host microflora resulting in enriched enteric function [36]. A combination of synergistically acting prebiotics and probiotics, known as synbiotics are supposed to selectively stimulate growth and/or activation of the metabolism of intestinal microbiota positively affecting the host. Adults IBS patients had a significant reduction in the severity of IBS symptoms with multi-strain synergistic therapy [37]. There is rising evidence indicating the modulation of prebiotics and probiotics on the human gut microbiota and its alterations towards a healthier composition for patients [38].
Dietary Interventions
The diet has the strongest and most direct influence over the microbiota of the gut profile [33]. It is a risk factor for pathophysiology and a therapy for active disease. A common diet recommended to patients with IBD is the healthy Mediterranean diet rich in fresh fruits and vegetables, monounsaturated fats, complex carbohydrates and lean protein [39].
FMT (Fecal Microbiota Transplantation)
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation is the reestablishment of a healthy gut microbiome, promoting the growth of certain species and preventing the colonization of others by infusing a fecal inoculation from a healthy donor into a patient. This is most effective for patients who have recurrent Clostridium difficile infections. There are current clinical trials being conducted to evaluate FMT as a new therapy in IBD. However, there has been a lack of consistency so far, indicating more research needs to be completed to identify the optimal microbiota composition for long term efficacy in IBD patients [40].
Phage Therapy
Phage therapy is the modulation of phageome and bacteriome of a person suffering from a disease of bacterial origin [41]. It has grown in popularity since it can be used as an alternative treatment when traditional antibiotics are ineffective in patients with IBD. The addition of bacteriophages to the human microbiome can target the elimination of harmful pathogens without disturbing the beneficial microbial communities. The low toxicity minimizes risk of severe immune reactions and adverse effects, and the self-replication allows low doses to be effective [42].
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Considerations
While there has not been much research conducted on the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) on IBD specifically, multiple studies have suggested that OMT can improve inflammation [43]. OMT demonstrated a reduction in TNF-α in patients with chronic low back pain [44]. Additionally, OMT has shown to promote balance of the autonomic nervous system by attenuating sympathetic activity and increasing parasympathetic activity [43]. These ideas can be applied to reducing the increase in cytokines occurring with IBD patients. Various soft non-manipulative treatments on Crohn's disease including cranial, myofascial and visceral techniques improved overall and physical quality of life [45].
IBD arises from a complex interplay of genetic susceptibility, immune dysregulation, environmental influences, and gut microbial imbalance. Dysbiosis and chronic inflammation extend beyond the gut, affecting neural pathways that regulate mood and cognition. Cytokine signaling, impaired mucosal function, and altered microbiome metabolites disrupt serotonin synthesis and contribute to CNS symptoms frequently observed in IBD. This bidirectional relationship between inflammation and the CNS reinforces disease persistence and impacts quality of life. Similarly gut, brain, and immune interactions seen in conditions like long COVID highlight shared systemic mechanisms. Dietary interventions, particularly the Mediterranean diet, can positively shape gut microbiota and serve as therapy for IBD. Emerging treatments such as fetal microbiota transplantation and phage therapy aim to restore healthy gut balance and target harmful bacteria, though more research is needed for consistent efficacy. OMT may also benefit IBD patients by reducing inflammation, balancing autonomic activity, and improving quality of life through gentle, non-invasive techniques. Effective management requires an integrative approach that targets both the gut and CNS through microbiome and neuroimmune therapies. Future research should clarify the causal links between dysbiosis, immune activation, and CNS outcomes to guide more precise, personalized treatment options. Understanding the gut brain axis will be key to developing personalized and holistic treatment strategies for IBD.
The research work of DKA is supported by the R25AI179582 grant from the National Institutes of Health, USA. The contents of this research article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
All authors have read the manuscript and declare no conflict of interest. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
All authors have read the manuscript and consented for publication.