Vicky Jocelyne Ama Moor1,2*, Doris Bibi Essama1, Batakeh B Agoons1, Joel Cedric Bayem4, Ntep Gwet Marie3,4, Ahmadou Musa Jingi5, Jan Rene Nkeck1, Bernadette Ngo Nonga1,2
1Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon
2Yaoundé University Hospital Centre, Yaoundé, Cameroon
3Yaoundé Central Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon
4Higher Institute of Medical Technology, Yaoundé, Cameroon
5Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bamenda, Bamenda, Cameroon
*Corresponding author: Vicky Jocelyne Ama Moor, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Received: 09 December 2021; Accepted: 16 December 2021; Published: 05 January 2022
Background Obesity and dyslipidemia are both lipid related diseases, and the management of obesity involves considering disorders of lipid metabolism. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between obesity and lipid profile parameters in Cameroonians adults.
Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study at two teaching hospitals in Yaoundé (Cameroon). Consenting adults with a BMI ≥25kg/m² were recruited. Participants taking lipid-modifying drugs were excluded. Total cholesterol, HDL, and triglycerides levels were assessed on a fasting blood sample using standardized and automated enzymatic methods. LDL cholesterol was estimated using the Friedewald formula. Chi² test was used to compare proportions and seek for associations between lipid profile components and BMI, with a significance threshold of 0.05.
Results 136 participants (105 females, 77.3%) aged 58.8 ± 11 years on average were included. They were classified as overweight (44.1%), grade I (35.2%), grade II (13.2%), and grade III obesity (7.3%). Their main comorbidities were hypertension (63.9%) and diabetes (60.2%). Among them, 72.7% had a sedentary life style while 31.6% were alcohol consumers. The prevalence of dyslipidaemia was 52.9%, with main subtypes being HDL hypocholesterolaemia (54.4%) and hypertriglyceridemia (47.06%). There were no significant associations between BMI and lipid profile indices.
Conclusion Half of the obese Cameroonians adults of the sample suffer from dyslipidemia, but it is not directly related to their BMI.
Cameroon; Dyslipidemia; Obesity
Cameroon articles; Dyslipidemia articles; Obesity articles
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines obesity as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that presents a risk to health [1]. It is considered a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. It is an increasing global public health issue and the second most common cause of preventable death after smoking [2]. Nearly one-third, or about 61.3 million adults over the age of 20 worldwide, are obese [3]. Obesity is a multifaceted and complex disease of genetic, socio-economic, environmental, and behavioral origin, and increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, significantly decreasing life expectancy by 5–10 years [4]. It is now clear that the prevalence of obesity has increased rapidly worldwide over the past two decades, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, due to rapid modernization and diet changes [5]. This trend is not gender, age, or ethnic group specific. The conditions associated with obesity are numerous and varied and include insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and alterations in lipid metabolism [6]. The importance of an in-depth understanding of obesity and its effects on lipid metabolism is crucial.
Dyslipidemia is a metabolic abnormality leading to a persistent increase in plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Approximately 60-70% of patients who are obese are dyslipidemic [7]. Multiple epidemiologic studies have shown obesity and dyslipidemia to be modifiable risk factors of coronary heart disease (CHD) [8-10]. Interestingly, despite the greater burden of CHD affecting low-income countries, the majority of these studies have been done in western settings [11]. Accruing evidence suggests an influence of geographical location on the prevalence and associated factors of obesity and dyslipidemia [12]; indeed in Cameroon, Ama Moor et al. found a high dyslipidemia prevalence of 56.4%, in patients with cardiovascular risk or disease [13], compared to 31.8% in China [14]. As CHD can result from obesity and dyslipidemia, adequate understanding of these in a sub-Saharan obese subpopulation can help in lowering the burden of heart disease in these regions. Currently, there is little information on the characteristics of the lipid profile of obese populations in sub-Saharan African studies. Understanding the clinical presentation of dyslipidemia in obesity is of paramount importance for public health policies, especially in resource-limited countries. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess the relationship between obesity and lipid profile parameters in adult Cameroonians.
2.1. Ethical considerations
The study protocol was approved by the Ethical committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences of the University of Douala, Cameroon (1458/CEI-UDm/04/2018/T). All study procedure was done in accordance with the 2013 revised Helsinki Declaration and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonization. All participants provided a written informed consent form before beginning this study.
2.2. Study design and Setting
We carried out a cross-sectional study at the internal medicine units of two teaching hospitals in Yaoundé (Cameroon). Study participants were recruited from 1st February 2018 to 30th June 2018. Participants for this study were recruited from a pool of patients consulted at the two designated hospitals. All adult subjects aged 20 years and above, with a BMI ≥ 25 Kg /m2, and who gave their consent were subsequently recruited. Subjects who refused to participate in the study, those taking lipid-modifying drugs such as statins, and those with hemolyzed blood serum found during laboratory analysis were excluded. Hemolysis has been proven to significantly interfere with blood lipid measurement [15].
2.3. Sample size estimation
The sample size was estimated for convenience. Our minimum sample size was 75 participants, estimated using the Cochran’s formula [16].
3.1. Assessment of Covariates
Baseline characteristics including age, sex, race, marital status, smoking status, family history of obesity/dyslipidemia, and level of physical activity were obtained using standardized questionnaires. Physical activity was defined as participating in moderate-intensity sports or activities that cause an increase in breathing or heart rate for 10 minutes continuously.
3.2. Assessment of Obesity
All participants underwent a complete physical exam and their clinical variables were documented. Body mass index was assessed using the De Quetelet formula [17]. Then, participants were subclassified into the following quartiles according to their BMI values [17]:
Overweight: 25-29.9 kg/m²
Grade 1 obesity: 30-34.9 kg/m²
Grade 2 obesity: 35-39.9 kg/m²
Grade 3 Obesity; ≥40 kg/m²
3.3. Assessment of Lipid Profile
Blood was sampled from a vein in the antecubital fossa after proper site hygiene. To minimize the risk of hemolysis, a loose venous occlusion model was employed. The sample was immediately put in a non-anticoagulant (dry tube) tube and sent to the laboratory within 20 minutes of sampling. Prior to blood sampling, participants were asked to fast for 12 hours prior.
The following markers were used for lipid profile analysis: Total cholesterol (TC), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and Triglycerides (TG). Analysis was done using the CYAN START photometer of the CYPRESS Laboratory. Total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides were determined using an enzymatic method found in commercial kits of the CYPRESS Laboratory (Langdorp, Belgium); the results were validated using a quantitative control serum. LDL-C was obtained using the Friedewald equation [18].
3.4. Operational terms
Obesity and overweight were defined in this study, according to the WHO BMI criteria [17]. Dyslipidemia was diagnosed by the presence of any lipid profile abnormality and was divided into hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol ≥ 2 g/L), hyper-LDL cholesterolemia (LDLc ≥ 1.6 g/L), hyper triglyceridemia (triglycerides ≥ 1.5 g/L), and/or a hypo HDL cholesterolemia (HDLc < 0.4 g/L) [19]. The atherogenic index was calculated as the ratio of plasma concentration of total cholesterol to HDL-C and was considered high, if above >4.85.
3.5. Statistical analysis
Data were encoded using the CS Pro software version 4.1. Statistical analysis was done using Epi Info 3.54 software and represented in tables using the Microsoft Excel 2010 software. The chi-square test was used to compare proportions. Difference was found to be significant if the p-value was less than 0.05.
A total of 180 subjects were invited to take part in this study. Subjects with incomplete data and who refused to participate were excluded. Thus, 136 participants were enrolled finally. In this sample, heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes were the most common comorbidities.
4.1. Sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics
As shown in table 1, this study population had a mean age of 58.9 ± 11.9years, with 105 (77%) being women. The most represented age group was 65-70 years of age (21.3 %). Mean BMI was 32.1 ±5.1 kg/m². When stratified by BMI, 10 participants (7.4%) were found to be morbidly obese. A total of 51 participants had a positive psycho-stimulant consumption history.
|
Variables |
Overall |
|
|
N (%) |
136 (100) |
|
|
Mean age, year, (SD) |
58 (11.9) |
|
|
Age, min-max, year |
20-85 |
|
|
Comorbidities, n (%) |
||
|
HTA |
87(63.8) |
|
|
Type 2 diabetes |
82(60.3) |
|
|
Heart Failure |
6(4.4) |
|
|
Physical inactivity |
99 (72.9) |
|
|
Mean BMI, Kg/m² (SD) |
23.8 (3.6) |
|
|
BMI (Kg/m²), n (%) |
||
|
Overweight |
25 – 30 |
60(44.1) |
|
grade 1 obesity |
30 – 35 |
48(35.3) |
|
grade 2 obesity |
35 – 40 |
18(13.2) |
|
morbidly obese |
>40 |
10(7.4) |
|
Abdominal circumference (cm), SD |
102.5 (11.5) |
|
|
Physical inactivity |
33 (22.9) |
|
|
smokers, n (%) |
8 (5.9) |
|
|
Alcohol consumption, n (%), |
43 (31.6) |
Table 1: Characteristics of the sample.
Lipid profile analysis in this cohort of participants are shown in Table 2. Seventy-two (72) participants had one or more forms of dyslipidemia, giving a prevalence of 52.9%. Analysis showed that the major form of dyslipidemia found was HDL hypocholesterolemia (54.4%). Atherogenic risk evaluation was found to be high in 26.4%. In Table 3, the presence of diabetes was found to be significantly associated with dyslipidemia.
|
Lipid abnormalities |
||||
|
Yes |
No |
TOTAL |
p value |
|
|
Associated factors |
n (%) |
n (%) |
n (%) |
|
|
High blood pressure |
||||
|
Yes |
43(49.4) |
40(50.6) |
83(64) |
0.14 |
|
No |
29(59.2) |
20(40.8) |
49(36) |
|
|
Diabetes |
||||
|
yes |
36(43.9) |
46(56.1) |
82(60.1) |
0.004 |
|
No |
36(66.67) |
18(33.3) |
54(39.9) |
|
|
Smokers |
||||
|
Yes |
5(62.5) |
3(37.5) |
8(5.9) |
0.3 |
|
No |
67(52.3) |
61(47.7) |
128(94.1) |
|
|
Alcohol consumption |
||||
|
yes |
25(58.14) |
18(41.86) |
43(31.6) |
0.3 |
|
No |
47(50.54) |
46(49.46) |
93(68.4) |
|
|
Physical activity |
||||
|
Yes |
20(54.1) |
17(44.7) |
37(27.2) |
0.4 |
|
No |
52(52.5) |
47(47.5) |
99(72.8) |
|
|
Gender |
||||
|
Female |
53(50.5) |
52(49.5) |
105(77.2) |
0.14 |
|
Male |
19(61.3) |
12(38.7) |
31(22.8) |
|
Table 2: Association of comorbidities and dyslipidemia.
|
Variables |
Frequency (%) |
|
Cholesterol Total (g/l) |
|
|
<1.4 |
22 (16.2) |
|
[1.4; 2[ |
91 (66.9) |
|
>2 |
23 (16.9) |
|
Cholesterol HDL (g/l) |
|
|
<0.4 |
74 (54.4) |
|
[0.4; 0.6[ |
51 (37.5) |
|
>0.6 |
11 (8.1) |
|
Cholesterol LDL (g/l) |
|
|
<1 |
69 (50.7) |
|
[1; 1.6[ |
59 (43.4) |
|
>1.6 |
8 (5.9) |
|
Triglycerides (g/l) |
|
|
<1 |
23 (16.9) |
|
[1; 1.5[ |
49 (36.0) |
|
>1.5 |
64 (47.1) |
|
Atherogenic index <4.5 |
100 (73.5) |
Table 3: Values of the Lipid Profile of the Study Population.
4.3. Association between Lipid profile abnormalities and BMI
The presence of dyslipidemia was assessed according to increasing BMI subcategories. We observed that HDL and TG levels were higher in overweight subjects (32(43.2%) and 26(41.3%) respectively), while those of LDL and TC were higher in grade I obese subjects. However, results from our study population show that there exists no significant difference in lipid abnormalities with increasing BMI class. This is shown in Table 4.
|
Variables |
BMI (kg/m²) (n/%) |
p-value |
|||
|
25 – 30 |
30 – 35 |
35 – 40 |
>40 |
||
|
Total cholesterol |
|||||
|
<1.4 |
9(40.9) |
8(36.4) |
3(13.6) |
2(9.1) |
0.7 |
|
[1.4; 2[ |
44(47.3) |
29(31.2) |
13(14.0) |
7(7.5) |
|
|
>2 |
7(33.3) |
11(52.4) |
2(9.5) |
1(4.8) |
|
|
HDL cholesterol |
|||||
|
<0.4 |
32(43.2) |
26(35.1) |
8(10.8) |
8(10.8) |
0.3 |
|
[0.4; 0.6[ |
22(41.5) |
19(35.8) |
10(18.9) |
2(3.8) |
|
|
>0.6 |
6(66.7) |
3(33.3) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
|
|
LDL cholesterol |
|||||
|
<1 |
28(40.6) |
22(31.9) |
11(15.9) |
8(11.6) |
|
|
[1; 1.6[ |
30(50.8) |
21(35.6) |
7(11.9) |
1(1.7) |
0.15 |
|
>1.6 |
2(25.0) |
5(62.5) |
0(0) |
1(12.5) |
|
|
Triglycerides |
|||||
|
<1 |
12(52.2) |
8(34.8) |
2(8.7) |
1(4.3) |
0.3 |
|
[1; 1.5[ |
22(44.0) |
14(28.0) |
7(14.0) |
7(14) |
|
|
>1.5 |
26(41.3) |
26(41.3) |
9(14.3) |
2(3.2) |
Table 4: Lipid profile as a function of the BMI of the study population.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between obesity and lipid profile parameters in Cameroonian adults. The prevalence of dyslipidemia was 52.9%, the main subtypes being HDL, hypocholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Diabetes was significantly associated with dyslipidemia (0.004). There was no relationship between obesity subtypes and different lipid profile parameters. Similarly, there was no significant difference between the atherogenicity indices of the different types of obesity. The dyslipidemia associated with obesity predicts the majority of the increased CV risk seen in obese subjects. We found that the most frequent lipid abnormality was HDL hypocholesterolemia, with a percentage of 54.41%. The mean HDL cholesterol concentration was 0.40 ± 0.11. Stephien et al. reported a similar result after a cross-sectional study of obese nondiabetic patients. They showed that obesity is associated with lipid disturbances, in particular a reduction in HDL-C levels [20]. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) has a prominent place among the various lipid components; hence the name "good cholesterol", which has been attributed to it. The decrease in HDL-C concentration is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease [21]. Several studies have reported the inverse relationship between HDL-C and obesity [22, 23]. Further studies are needed to evaluate the extent to which obesity contributes to the decrease in HDL-C levels.
In this study, no significant correlation was found between each of the lipid profile parameters and obesity based on BMI. Stepien et al. reported a different result. They found a negative correlation between: BMI and CT, LDL, and HDL (r=-0.291; r=-0.310, r=-0.240, respectively). The negative correlations observed in their study between BMI, CT, and LDL-C would result from lower LDL-C levels in morbidly obese patients, as reported by other authors [24, 25]. Many scientists who have conducted studies in the general population have reported increased BMI and decreased HDL-C and increased TG [26]. Howard et al. found that the relationship between BMI and serum LDL-C levels is much more complex and would depend on unmodifiable factors, particularly age or gender. The Strong Heart study of 773 women and 739 men of American Indian origin reported a similarly different result from our study, in which morbidly obese patients had lower LDL-C levels than other patients, which was statistically significant [24,25,27]. We found a significant association between diabetes and dyslipidemia (p=0.004), confirming the findings of other studies evaluating dyslipidemia as a common condition of diabetes [28-30]. A few elements have been questioned as contributing to the alterations in lipid metabolism frequently observed in diabetes: insulin deficiency or resistance, adipocytokines and hyperglycemia [31]. Dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes in particular is characterized by a decrease in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and an increase in triglyceride levels, all of which usually occur several years before the onset of diabetes [32, 33]. Recently published evidence indicates that low HDL cholesterol alone is a factor in the development of diabetes. It is therefore crucial to act by regulating the lipid profile of patients at risk. Taking action through lifestyle modification is paramount in the management of diabetes-related dyslipidemia and includes diet modification, weight loss, and exercise [34]. Notice that regarding physical activity, only 37(27.21%) of our subjects included practiced a minimum physical activity of 30 minutes for at least 5 times a week as recommended. After the age of 70, both free fat mass and fat mass decrease together [35]. The most represented age group in our population was 65-70 years old, with an average BMI of 32.09 ±5.11. In addition, 77% of the population had a lower atherogenic index, indicating a protective role of high BMI in the elderly. An observation that has already been reported in previous studies and meta analyses [36] The present study has some limitations. This was a cross-sectional study and therefore it is subject to the issues of unmeasured, residual confounding and reverse causation. Hence, this limits our ability to establish causality between obesity and the dyslipidemic indices we studied. Moreover, the possibly small sample size could have impacted the ability of this study to detect significant differences. However, the findings presented in this study provide preliminary data to guide lipid research in sub-saharan Africa.
Half of the obese Cameroonians adults of the sample suffer from dyslipidemia, but it is not directly related to their BMI. The prevalence of dyslipidemia was 52.94%; distributed in decreasing order of frequency in hypo HDL cholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, total hypercholesterolemia and LDL hypercholesterolemia.
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
We are grateful to the staff of the Yaoundé Central Hospital and Biyem-assi District Hospital for their help in the recruitment of study participants. Additionally, we thank the participants for their contribution to our study.
VJAM, NGM, BNN designed the study
JCB, DBE, BBA, AMJ, JRN collected data.
VJAM, DBE, BBA, AMJ, JRN analyzed data
VJAM, DBE, JCB, BBA, AMJ, JRN, NGM built the manuscript
All authors revised the manuscript
The study was done under the supervision of BNN.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.